Baffling The Bureaucracy And The Public?
Heh. The House of Spellings seems satisfied with the effort that most states are putting forth in order to get "highly qualified" teachers in front of the nation's public school classrooms:
Under federal pressure, most states are close to getting teachers who are rated highly qualified in front of every math, history, language and other core class by the end of the school year. Or so they say.Read the whole thing.
Thirty-three states claim 90 percent to 99 percent of their main classes have teachers who are highly qualified. That means, based on the No Child Left Behind law, that those teachers have a bachelor's degree, a state license and proven competency in every subject they teach.
Most of the other states put their numbers a tier below _ 70 percent to 89 percent _ and a few are way behind, according to a review of new state data by The Associated Press.
The accuracy of those accounts is now under review by the Education Department, which is checking not just total numbers but also the figures within poor and struggling schools.
President Bush and Congress have promised parents that 100 percent of core classes will have highly qualified teachers by the end of the school year.
That pledge is a big part of Bush's education law, the pride of his domestic agenda.
With few states, if any, expected to reach full compliance on time, the department plans to allow an extra year to states that have shown a good-faith effort. Others could lose millions of dollars in aid if federal officials don't see enough progress.
"What we're trying to measure is whether states are on track," said Rene Islas, who oversees teacher quality for the department's elementary and secondary education office. "They don't necessarily have to be at 100 percent, but they have to be pretty close, and they have to be pretty close in all of the areas we're measuring."
States must prove they have:
_Set a fair definition of "highly qualified." Although the federal law sets the parameters, states have huge leeway when it comes to qualifying their veteran teachers.
_Provided parents with a clear picture of how many classes are taught by qualified teachers. This is supposed to happen in state, district and school report cards.
_Given complete and accurate data about their teacher corps to the Education Department, including the disparities between poor and wealthier schools.
_Ensured that poor and minority children do not have a higher percentage of inexperienced or unqualified teachers than any other youngsters.
By May 15, states will find out where they stand and whether they will lose federal aid, which is the government's only real enforcement tool.
I think that many would agree that simply having the federal government's stamp of approval does not make a teacher "highly-qualified."
Here in California, there are so many various combinations that can be used in order to "tweak" a teacher's work history and formal education that just about everyone who has worked more than 5 years in the classroom is considered (at least by the EduCrats in Sacramento and Washington) to be "highly qualified."
Both kids and parents know better.